Rivas Goldstein, LLP Call : 646-859-3790

AKS violations: A timeline of a typical case

Lawmakers designed the federal Anti-Kickback Statute (AKS) to help better ensure medical professionals focus on the well-being of their patients. Lawmakers intended this piece of regulation to reduce the risk of medical decisions based on financial gain. But what happens when the government accuses a medical company or individual of an AKS violation? The following discussion provides a basic timeline.

Step one: Awareness and charges

First, the government must become aware of a potential violation. This generally occurs either through a government investigation after noticing a discrepancy in Medicare or Medicaid claims or from a tip given by a whistleblower. If substantiated, the government may move forward with criminal charges.

If the government pursues criminal charges, authorities will notify the individual or business. At this time, it is wise to begin building a defense.

Step two: Build a defense strategy

The defensive strategy may vary. One example may include a motion for summary judgment. This strategy was recently used by pharmaceutical company Teva after the government accused it of AKS violations. The pharmaceutical company filed for summary judgment arguing that it already had compliance materials in place to mitigate the risk of such a violation. Upon review of the motion, the judge dismissed the claim stating that although it had the needed documents it did not appear that the company had followed the regulations as outlined within the documents.

If the motion is not successful, as outlined in the case above, the accused is wise to implement another defensive strategy. This could include gathering evidence to establish that there was not a violation or to show that the alleged infraction falls within a safe harbor. Generally, those who are fighting against these claims will have multiple strategies working in conjunction to help better ensure success.

It is important to note that this example progression is relatively basic. The exact timeline will depend on the facts of each individual case. As a result, it is wise for those who faced such allegations to seek legal counsel experienced in this area of the law to better ensure a defensive strategy that is in line with their best interests.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Email Us For A Response

Schedule A Consultation With An Attorney

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Austin Office
3345 Bee Cave Rd, Suite 104
Austin, TX 78746

Phone: 512-481-2916
Map & Directions

New York Office
By Appointment Only
405 Lexington Ave 26th Floor
New York, NY 10174

Phone: 646-859-3790
Map & Directions

New Jersey Office
By Appointment Only
1 Gateway Center, Suite 2600
Newark, NJ 07102

Phone: 646-859-3790
Map & Directions

Review Us